The two words of best practice of affairs and proper implementation of laws in Article 174 of the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Iran emphasize the right of the judiciary to supervise the executive agencies. Where are their citation sources? Do they both have a same meaning? If so, then what is meant by the main legislator of their separate mention? What are the similarities and differences between them? These questions and questions of this kind come to mind when referring to this Article of the Constitution and to Article 156. By referring to the records, including the detailed discussions of the legislator, as well as the logical discussions of some scholars, although some of its dimensions are described, but we do not get a complete and comprehensive answer, so we have tried to draw from another angle, based on practical experiences, to express the dimensions different points of the case and referred to as accountability and at least expressing our personal views.
Bagheri komar oliya,M. (2018). Best Practice of affairs and proper implementation of laws Differences and similarities. Administrative Health Research, 10(2), 59-68.
MLA
Bagheri komar oliya,M. . "Best Practice of affairs and proper implementation of laws Differences and similarities", Administrative Health Research, 10, 2, 2018, 59-68.
HARVARD
Bagheri komar oliya M. (2018). 'Best Practice of affairs and proper implementation of laws Differences and similarities', Administrative Health Research, 10(2), pp. 59-68.
CHICAGO
M. Bagheri komar oliya, "Best Practice of affairs and proper implementation of laws Differences and similarities," Administrative Health Research, 10 2 (2018): 59-68,
VANCOUVER
Bagheri komar oliya M. Best Practice of affairs and proper implementation of laws Differences and similarities. AHR, 2018; 10(2): 59-68.