روش شناسی ایضاح مفاهیم نظارت و بازرسی

Scientific research shows that ambiguity in laws and regulations is always expressed as a fundamental factor in the set of causes and of corruption. On this basis, these questions arose: what is the method for removing ambiguity from the concepts contained in the rules and regulations? Is Law among the other human knowledge responsible for resolving the ambiguity of such concepts? The author's claim is that when speaking about ambiguity in the meaning of the words and phrases contained in the text of the rules, language and text matter. And removing the ambiguity of the text has its own linguistic knowledge. The knowledge that can clarify ambiguity among its important examples, the ambiguous concepts of Supervision and Inspection, is the Knowledge of semantics and methods recommended in this knowledge. The author while introducing knowledge and semantic methods tries to show that; How are pbt keywords in the text of the law examined and measured in a semantic field and in a systematic analysis ? The ratio of these keywords is checked within the following topics: other words, context, the derivatives of that word in the text, the meanings of each derivative in its text application, Synonyms of any meaning and finally in relation to concepts that were cited in the text And for any measure, a feature or features for that ambiguous concept is obtained. By summing up these features, the dimensions of that ambiguous concept are identified and clarified.