Evaluation and rating of decent governance indicators

Decent governance is a multifaceted concept, the goal of decent governance is to increase the efficiency of a political system for the administration of society. In traditional politics, the main issue of power is government, but in governance, the main issue is better to run society and institutions with the support of government power. Although researchers in various sciences have looked at the issue of good governance from their perspective and make recommendations for implementation, given the limitations of governments, it is necessary to identify priorities in good governance; evaluating good governance indicators in developing countries requires a multifaceted approach, so the present study was conducted with the aim of evaluating and ranking good governance indicators from the perspective of experts using the method of Phase hierarchical analysis. According to studies, the key components of decent governance can be considered political stability, quality of supervision, control of corruption, rule of law, effectiveness of government and participation. On the other hand, in order to evaluate Governance Indicators, three methods of calculating the Millennium Challenge, The Global Governance Index and the combined index were also evaluated. Corruption control was considered the most important criterion for evaluating among the criteria for evaluating the indicators of decent governance; the next rankings belong to the criteria of the rule of Law, popular participation, quality of supervision, political stability and effectiveness of the state, respectively. In view of the results obtained in response to the question of which method is best suited to evaluate decent governance, taking into account all the evaluation criteria among the methods examined, it can be said that the Global Governance Index is ranked first. The next rankings are the combined Index and the Millennium Challenge Account, respectively.